Streamline hiring with effortless screening tools
Optimise your hiring process with HiPeople's AI assessments and reference checks.
Ever wonder why some people seem to get ahead at work while others struggle, even when everyone’s doing their job well? The answer often lies in understanding and navigating organizational politics. It’s not about being manipulative or playing games; it’s about recognizing the power dynamics, building relationships, and knowing how to get things done in a workplace.
Whether you're aiming for a promotion, trying to influence a decision, or simply looking to get along with your colleagues, understanding the unspoken rules of office politics can make all the difference. In this guide, we'll break down the ins and outs of organizational politics in a way that’s simple, straightforward, and actually useful, so you can use these dynamics to your advantage without losing your integrity or feeling like you’re caught in a power struggle.
Organizational politics refers to the actions and behaviors people use within a company to gain power, influence decisions, or advance personal or group interests. These actions often occur outside of formal channels of authority and can involve both positive and negative strategies. Politics can manifest in various ways—through alliances, strategic communication, or the manipulation of resources—and it is not always transparent. While often associated with competition and rivalry, organizational politics can also play a vital role in building relationships, advancing initiatives, and driving company-wide goals.
At its core, organizational politics is a way to navigate the complex web of interpersonal relationships and power structures that exist in every workplace. Whether you're vying for a promotion, pushing a new project, or trying to influence a decision, understanding and engaging in the political landscape is often crucial for getting things done.
Organizational politics plays a significant role in how decisions are made, how relationships are formed, and how resources are allocated within an organization. Its importance extends beyond individual career advancement—it also affects the company's culture, effectiveness, and long-term success.
Understanding the significance of organizational politics helps you recognize its role in your daily work and in the larger dynamics of your company.
At the heart of organizational politics lies power and influence—two fundamental elements that shape decisions, guide behaviors, and determine success within the workplace. While both terms are often used interchangeably, they are distinct yet interconnected concepts.
Power is the ability to get things done or to affect the behavior of others. It’s often derived from one’s position in the organizational hierarchy (positional power) or through personal expertise (expert power). Those who hold power are able to make decisions, allocate resources, and set strategic direction. However, power isn't always held by those in leadership roles; informal leaders who wield influence through their networks and knowledge can also have considerable power.
Influence, on the other hand, refers to the capacity to shape or alter the behavior, opinions, or decisions of others, often without formal authority. It comes from relationships, credibility, and trust. Influence is subtler than power and can be just as, if not more, effective in shaping outcomes. A leader may have positional power, but it's their ability to influence their team that often determines the success of a project or initiative.
Both power and influence are essential in organizational politics. Political players strategically use their power to gain support, negotiate resources, and move agendas forward. At the same time, they leverage their influence to persuade colleagues, gain allies, and shift the focus toward their own objectives.
Understanding organizational politics is critical because it affects nearly every aspect of your work life. From career advancement to day-to-day interactions, how you engage with politics in the workplace determines your success and ability to thrive.
Understanding how organizational politics operate is essential for managing your career, building effective relationships, and driving results. It also equips you to thrive in a competitive work environment where influence and power shape opportunities and success.
Understanding the dynamics of organizational politics requires recognizing the different roles and power structures within a workplace. Politics are driven by various players who operate within a web of relationships, and the impact of these dynamics can be felt across the organization. These power plays aren’t always formal; sometimes they operate beneath the surface, affecting decision-making, collaboration, and even morale.
In any organization, there are a range of individuals who influence the political environment, and each player has their own set of goals and methods of achieving them. Identifying these key players can help you navigate the workplace dynamics more effectively.
The first group you’ll encounter is formal leaders—managers, directors, and executives who wield power because of their positions within the organization. However, their influence isn’t always guaranteed. Sometimes, formal leaders may struggle to maintain influence if they lack political savvy or don’t build relationships across the organization.
On the other hand, informal leaders are often the true power brokers. These are individuals who may not have an official title but are respected by their peers for their expertise, charisma, or ability to influence others. Informal leaders might not be in the decision-making rooms, but they hold sway over opinions, ideas, and outcomes. Recognizing informal leaders is crucial because they can often make or break initiatives, even if they aren’t directly involved in the formal decision-making process.
Then, there are the bureaucrats—the individuals who excel at navigating organizational rules, regulations, and procedures. They can hold significant power because they are often the gatekeepers of resources, information, or compliance. While they might not be as visibly influential as some of the other players, their ability to control or influence the flow of work within an organization gives them an important, if subtle, role in organizational politics.
Rebels and change agents add another layer to the political environment. These individuals are willing to challenge the status quo and push for transformation. While their ideas may disrupt the organization, they are often catalysts for progress and can attract a loyal following if their vision resonates with others. Their political influence lies in their ability to inspire change and rally others to their cause.
Lastly, there are the supporters and allies—the individuals who may not be central players but help to sustain and propel others’ agendas. These allies provide the necessary backing to make ideas or initiatives successful. In any workplace, it’s often the strength of your alliances that determines your level of political success.
Power within an organization comes from multiple sources, each of which influences political dynamics differently. The ability to recognize where power resides in your workplace can help you assess the best way to navigate your role and interact with others.
Positional power is the most traditional form of power. It comes with the authority granted by a specific role in the organization, whether that’s a manager, director, or executive. Positional power is based on the control over decisions and resources that come with a formal position. While this power is crucial for enforcing policies and making large-scale decisions, it can be undermined if the person in power doesn’t have the necessary political skills or support from others.
Another source of power is expert power. This type of power comes from possessing valuable, specialized knowledge or skills that others in the organization rely on. Experts have influence because people seek their guidance or expertise, and this often gives them an outsized impact on decisions, especially in highly technical fields or industries. People who hold expert power are often consulted for their opinions, and their influence can be hard to challenge because of their unique value.
Network power is another vital form of influence. In today’s workplace, knowing the right people often matters as much as what you know. If you have strong connections to individuals who control resources or who hold decision-making power, you wield network power. The more people you know across various levels of the organization, the more you can leverage those relationships to your advantage. This type of power is often behind the scenes but plays a significant role in day-to-day organizational functioning.
Resource control refers to power derived from having access to critical resources—whether that’s information, budget, or talent. If you control resources that others depend on, you have influence. Resource control is especially powerful in environments where access to resources can directly impact people’s success, such as in marketing budgets, R&D initiatives, or hiring decisions.
Lastly, coercive power involves the ability to control others through fear or punishment. While this can be a powerful tool, it’s often seen in a negative light and can erode trust over time. People who rely on coercive power can create an atmosphere of fear or anxiety, but it doesn’t necessarily create loyalty or long-term success. Instead, it can lead to resentment or passive resistance.
The way politics manifest in the workplace can have a significant impact on the overall culture of the organization. Organizational culture is shaped by the attitudes, behaviors, and values that are common among employees. Politics, both healthy and toxic, influence this culture and can either enhance or disrupt it.
In a healthy political environment, power dynamics are typically transparent and serve the collective interests of the team. People may engage in politics to build alliances, advocate for resources, or support their colleagues' success. Healthy political behavior is grounded in trust and mutual respect, and it focuses on achieving shared goals. For example, a leader who uses their position to support the growth of their team members and ensure everyone has a voice in key decisions contributes to a culture of collaboration and inclusiveness.
Toxic politics, on the other hand, can poison an organization’s culture. When individuals or groups use manipulation, deceit, and underhanded tactics to further their own agendas, it creates a climate of distrust and competition. People may feel that success is determined by who you know, not what you know. This can lead to employees being more focused on advancing their personal interests rather than contributing to the organization’s goals. The culture becomes one of backstabbing, secrecy, and power struggles, which can reduce morale, hamper creativity, and even drive top talent out of the organization.
For instance, if a company has a culture where employees regularly undermine each other to gain favor with management, trust within teams erodes. Employees may become disengaged, feeling that their efforts won’t be rewarded fairly or that they need to fight for recognition at every turn. This creates a toxic feedback loop where the politics of the organization drive the culture into an unhealthy space.
However, when organizations manage politics effectively—creating clear communication channels, recognizing the value of diverse viewpoints, and ensuring transparency—politics can be used as a force for good. These organizations tend to have a more positive culture where collaboration, innovation, and ethical decision-making thrive.
At the core, organizational politics are a reflection of the underlying values, beliefs, and behaviors that guide people’s actions. Whether the politics are constructive or destructive, they will always have an impact on the culture. Understanding how politics shape the workplace culture can help you anticipate challenges, build stronger relationships, and create a more positive and productive environment for everyone.
Political behavior can often be subtle, but once you understand the common tactics, you can spot them more easily and learn how to respond. Not all political behavior is harmful, but recognizing when it's being used for personal gain or to manipulate others can make all the difference. Understanding these behaviors helps you stay ahead of the game and ensures you can maintain your integrity while navigating the workplace dynamics.
There are various strategies people use to gain power, influence, or resources in the workplace. Some are overt, while others are more covert, working behind the scenes to affect outcomes. By identifying these strategies, you can understand the motivations behind people’s actions and decide how best to interact with them.
One of the most common strategies is building alliances. This involves forging strong relationships with influential people within the organization. By aligning with key decision-makers or respected colleagues, individuals can secure resources, support, or opportunities that may not be accessible otherwise. Alliances can be formal or informal, but they are vital in gaining influence and securing favor when necessary.
Another frequent tactic is coalition-building, where people gather a group of like-minded individuals to push a particular agenda or initiative. Coalitions allow individuals to amplify their influence by working together toward common goals. The more people you can rally around a cause, the more pressure you can exert on decision-makers. This strategy often happens in meetings or behind closed doors, as members of the coalition attempt to sway opinions and gather backing for their proposals.
Information control is another powerful political strategy. By selectively sharing or withholding critical information, individuals can shape outcomes to their advantage. This tactic can be seen when someone has access to important data or resources and manipulates the flow of information to influence decision-making. Information control isn’t always about being dishonest—it may involve timing when to release certain details or choosing what to share to achieve a particular result.
Framing involves shaping the narrative or perception of an issue or event in a way that benefits the individual or group in power. By highlighting certain aspects of a situation while downplaying others, individuals can influence how others interpret a situation. This strategy can be especially effective in meetings or during negotiations, where the framing of a proposal or outcome can directly impact how it is received by others.
Lastly, strategic positioning involves taking advantage of opportunities at the right moment. This could be positioning oneself as a leader of a new initiative or stepping in when a decision needs to be made, all while ensuring that credit is given when things go well. Timing is crucial here; those who can position themselves effectively can ensure they’re seen as the go-to person for certain tasks or responsibilities, often gaining recognition and influence in the process.
Political manipulation is more insidious and can be harder to detect because it often involves subtle tactics that take place under the radar. Here are the signs you should watch out for:
Not all organizational politics are inherently bad. In fact, understanding and engaging in healthy political behavior can help you achieve your career goals, influence key decisions, and create positive change. However, when politics become toxic, they can undermine trust, collaboration, and even personal careers. So, how do you distinguish between the two?
Healthy politics are characterized by transparency, respect, and mutual benefit. They often involve honest conversations, open negotiations, and a willingness to collaborate for the greater good. Healthy political behavior is focused on advancing the organization’s goals while considering the needs and perspectives of others. People who engage in healthy politics use their influence to create an environment of support and growth, ensuring that decisions are made based on merit and alignment with the company's values.
In contrast, toxic politics are manipulative, divisive, and often undermine others to achieve personal gain. Toxic political behavior thrives on secrecy, dishonesty, and manipulation. It often includes undermining colleagues, spreading misinformation, or using fear and intimidation to control outcomes. Toxic politics create an environment of mistrust and fear, where people are more focused on self-preservation than working towards the organization’s success.
The key difference between healthy and toxic politics lies in intent and outcomes. Healthy politics aim to create positive change and benefit everyone involved, while toxic politics create division and resentment. Understanding where the line is between these two can help you make better decisions about how to engage in politics at work—and when to distance yourself from unhealthy behaviors.
Understanding organizational politics can be abstract without seeing how it plays out in real scenarios. Here are some examples that demonstrate different political strategies and behaviors, showing both positive and negative aspects of navigating workplace dynamics. These examples highlight how politics manifest in everyday workplace interactions and provide a clearer picture of how you can approach them.
Imagine two colleagues, Sarah and John, who are both vying for the same promotion. Sarah knows that the key decision-maker for this promotion is her manager, and she’s aware that the manager values team collaboration above individual achievements. Over time, Sarah builds strong relationships with her coworkers, making sure to actively contribute to team projects, support her colleagues' initiatives, and always align herself with the team's goals. As a result, when the time comes for the promotion decision, Sarah’s manager is more inclined to select her, recognizing her ability to work well with others and drive collective success.
John, on the other hand, focuses mainly on his individual performance and doesn’t invest much in team relationships. While his work is technically excellent, it’s clear that he hasn’t formed the same level of trust or alliances within the team. His manager, despite recognizing his individual accomplishments, ultimately chooses Sarah for the promotion because she has built a stronger network of support. This example illustrates how building alliances and focusing on the bigger team picture can help you get ahead in a workplace where collaboration is highly valued.
In a different scenario, let’s consider Mark, a senior analyst at a large company. He has access to critical data that could significantly impact an upcoming budget review meeting. Rather than simply sharing the data with his team, Mark strategically decides to withhold certain details and presents only the information that supports his proposed strategy. By doing this, Mark subtly influences the decision-makers, making them more inclined to adopt his plan, as it appears to be the most informed and well-supported option.
However, the decision to withhold information doesn’t come without consequences. Some team members who were left out of the decision-making loop feel excluded and start to lose trust in Mark’s transparency. Over time, this begins to affect the team's dynamics, and other leaders within the organization start to notice Mark’s selective sharing of information. While he initially succeeded in advancing his agenda, the longer-term impact is a growing sense of mistrust among his colleagues. This example demonstrates the power of controlling information but also highlights the risks of using it manipulatively.
Consider the case of Laura, a mid-level manager at a tech company, who wants to bring about a significant change in the way her department handles project management. However, she knows that the proposal will be met with resistance from a few senior members of the team who are accustomed to the old processes. Rather than pushing for change on her own, Laura reaches out to colleagues in other departments who would benefit from the new system. Together, they form a coalition to champion the change, pooling their resources, ideas, and influence.
By the time Laura presents the proposal to upper management, she has a strong coalition of supporters, each with their own arguments and evidence in favor of the change. The proposal now has more weight, and the senior team members who were originally resistant are less able to push back against the collective support. In this example, Laura demonstrates how coalition-building can be an effective political strategy for driving change within an organization, especially when trying to influence larger, more resistant groups.
While many political strategies are used for positive outcomes, not all political behavior is ethical. Take, for instance, the example of Jake, a colleague who is trying to get ahead by undermining others in his department. Jake consistently spreads rumors about a coworker, Lisa, claiming she isn’t capable of handling her workload and that her recent project was a failure. Despite the fact that Lisa’s project was successful, Jake subtly manipulates the situation by sharing exaggerated negative opinions with higher-ups.
At first, the rumors don’t seem to have an immediate impact, but eventually, they begin to affect Lisa’s reputation within the company. Her colleagues start to question her abilities, and Jake’s colleagues grow more hesitant to collaborate with her. Jake, in turn, positions himself as a solution to the problem and begins to take over some of the responsibilities Lisa once held. While Jake’s behavior may have helped him advance in the short term, it creates a toxic work environment and erodes trust among the team. His manipulative actions ultimately backfire, as colleagues begin to see his true intentions and distrust him.
A common, though unethical, political strategy is to play the victim in order to gain sympathy and support. Take the example of Emma, a mid-level manager who has been working on a project that has faced several challenges. Rather than owning up to the mistakes made or addressing the project's issues head-on, Emma consistently frames herself as a victim of bad luck, poor timing, or unfair treatment by other departments. She constantly shares with her colleagues how difficult the project has been, how no one understands her position, and how other teams aren’t providing the necessary support.
By doing this, Emma gains sympathy from her peers and even some of her managers. They start to rally behind her, offering support and covering for the project’s deficiencies. However, this strategy causes the team to ignore the real issues that need addressing. Over time, people begin to recognize that Emma isn’t taking responsibility for the project’s failures and is instead deflecting blame onto others. As a result, while Emma might gain temporary support, she loses credibility and is seen as someone who avoids accountability. This example shows how using victimhood as a political tactic may provide short-term relief but can ultimately harm one's reputation in the long run.
These examples demonstrate the wide variety of political strategies that can play out in organizational settings. From building alliances and forming coalitions to using information strategically or engaging in manipulative behavior, each strategy has its potential rewards and risks. By understanding these dynamics, you can navigate organizational politics with a more informed perspective, helping you make decisions that align with your values and goals while avoiding the pitfalls of toxic behavior.
Organizational politics can influence your career and workplace dynamics in ways you might not immediately recognize. Depending on how politics are practiced within your organization, they can either open doors for you or create significant obstacles. Understanding these effects—both positive and negative—helps you navigate the political landscape more effectively, allowing you to make informed decisions about your involvement.
When organizational politics are used strategically, they can provide a significant boost to your career. Politics, in a healthy form, are often about using your relationships, influence, and timing to advance personal or professional objectives. Understanding how to leverage this can lead to new opportunities, increased visibility, and the support necessary to take on higher responsibilities.
One of the key ways politics can benefit your career is through visibility. If you know how to build strong networks and align yourself with influential people in the organization, you can make sure your work gets noticed. For example, collaborating with higher-ups or sharing your success in the right forums can help elevate your profile within the company. This doesn’t mean you need to brag or oversell yourself, but rather positioning your work as integral to the team or company’s goals ensures others recognize your contributions.
Another positive aspect of organizational politics is the ability to build strategic alliances. Relationships are one of the most powerful tools in career progression. By aligning with individuals who share similar goals or those in decision-making positions, you position yourself for new opportunities. These alliances can provide invaluable guidance, insider information, and support when you need it the most.
Finally, politics help with advocacy. Having a network of supporters allows you to advocate for yourself, your projects, or your team. When key stakeholders back your initiatives, you can push them forward with more confidence and success. Being seen as a leader or a go-to person for specific initiatives is a result of skillful political maneuvering, and it’s a crucial component of career growth.
While organizational politics can boost careers, they can also create significant issues within the workplace, especially when misused or abused. When politics become manipulative or toxic, they can damage morale, disrupt collaboration, and ultimately undermine the organization’s success.
One of the most common negative effects of unhealthy politics is the erosion of trust. When people perceive that their colleagues or leaders are engaging in manipulative behavior, trust can be shattered. Colleagues may start questioning each other’s motives, and team dynamics can become fractured. Without trust, effective communication breaks down, collaboration becomes difficult, and people start focusing more on self-preservation than on working toward shared goals.
Another consequence is the creation of a toxic work environment. When competition becomes cutthroat and self-interest trumps collective success, it leads to a workplace culture where people feel they need to constantly watch their backs. Employees may engage in gossip, sabotage, or exclusionary behavior to get ahead, and the overall atmosphere becomes one of fear and negativity. This culture can quickly spread throughout the organization, leading to high levels of disengagement, increased turnover, and a lack of employee loyalty.
Burnout is another potential outcome of toxic politics. When people feel the need to constantly fight for their survival within a politically charged environment, it can lead to emotional exhaustion. Employees may feel drained from navigating constant political battles, leaving them less motivated, less creative, and more likely to seek opportunities elsewhere. In the long run, this not only impacts individual well-being but also the organization’s ability to retain talent.
Finally, workplace inequity can arise when certain individuals or groups use politics to secure promotions or resources while others are left behind. This creates a perception of favoritism and unfairness, leading to decreased job satisfaction and disengagement. When meritocracy is replaced with political maneuvering, employees may feel their contributions are undervalued, which impacts their overall sense of belonging within the organization.
Organizational politics don’t just affect individual careers; they also shape the long-term health and success of the entire organization. If managed poorly, politics can have a profound impact on company culture, employee retention, and overall productivity.
One of the long-term effects of unchecked politics is decreased productivity. When employees spend more time navigating political minefields than focusing on their work, the organization’s output suffers. This can happen when internal power struggles or office politics take precedence over the primary work that needs to be done. If too much time is spent on protecting one’s own interests rather than collaborating toward organizational goals, productivity drops significantly.
Innovation can also suffer in politically charged environments. When toxic politics dominate, employees may become risk-averse, fearing that any new idea or project could be used against them in a power struggle. A lack of open communication and idea-sharing stifles creativity, as people are less likely to take chances or suggest innovative solutions when they are concerned about how their ideas will be received. Organizations that rely too heavily on politics often fail to foster an environment where innovation can thrive.
In the long run, an organization with persistent political issues may also struggle with retention and talent acquisition. When employees perceive that advancement is based more on political maneuvering than on skills or performance, they may leave for organizations with healthier work environments. High turnover rates drain the organization of experienced and knowledgeable employees, increasing recruitment and training costs. If the company’s reputation suffers due to internal politics, attracting top talent becomes increasingly difficult.
Another long-term effect is the potential for leadership instability. Political infighting within an organization can lead to inconsistent decision-making, poor leadership choices, and confusion about the company’s direction. When the leadership team is divided by internal politics or unable to work cohesively, the organization struggles to maintain a clear vision and execute on its objectives. This lack of stability can have cascading effects across the entire company, from day-to-day operations to long-term strategy.
Finally, unhealthy politics can undermine the company’s core values and impact its ability to align with its mission. In environments where personal gain is prioritized over collective success, the organization’s foundational values are often compromised. When employees see that those who engage in manipulative behavior are rewarded, it sends the message that ethics and integrity don’t matter. Over time, this culture can erode the organization's reputation, both internally and externally, leading to negative consequences for its brand and future prospects.
Ultimately, while organizational politics are inevitable, their impact can either be a driving force for growth and success or a destructive force that undermines the organization's potential. Being aware of these dynamics allows you to protect yourself and your career while contributing to a healthier, more productive workplace.
Mastering the art of navigating organizational politics is a critical skill in any workplace. It’s about knowing when to engage, how to build meaningful relationships, and when to step back. Successfully managing your political presence doesn’t mean you have to become manipulative or deceitful. It’s about understanding the systems and structures around you, aligning your goals with those of your colleagues, and positioning yourself as a collaborative and forward-thinking team player. Here’s how to do it:
By cultivating these skills and strategies, you can effectively navigate the political landscape without losing sight of your personal values or the company’s broader goals.
Toxic organizational politics can feel draining and disheartening, especially when they are pervasive throughout the workplace. These toxic dynamics can undermine your sense of purpose, create division among teams, and stifle growth. Fortunately, there are ways to manage and even overcome these negative aspects of office politics, without getting caught in the cycle of manipulation and deceit. Here are some steps to take when dealing with toxic politics:
By taking these steps, you can protect yourself from the damage caused by toxic politics and, in some cases, help reshape the environment around you into a healthier, more collaborative space.
Organizational politics are a natural part of any workplace, and while they can sometimes feel tricky to navigate, understanding how they work gives you the upper hand. It’s not about playing dirty—it’s about recognizing who holds influence, how power is distributed, and how you can work with others to achieve your goals. By building solid relationships, staying true to your values, and knowing when to engage and when to step back, you can navigate the political landscape in a way that benefits both you and your colleagues. At the end of the day, understanding office politics helps you make smarter decisions, influence outcomes, and move your career forward.
That said, it's important to remember that not all political behavior is bad. Healthy politics, when used effectively, can drive innovation, create opportunities, and strengthen team collaboration. The key is knowing how to spot the difference between positive, goal-oriented political behavior and toxic manipulation that harms relationships and productivity. By staying aware of the political dynamics around you and using them strategically, you can create a positive impact, build the right alliances, and thrive in your workplace without getting caught in the drama.